View Full Version : brake heat capacity modeling
tonto
10-24-2010, 02:41 PM
is there a method to model the front brakes vs speed differential in braking zones?
my motivation is to figure out if i can get by with ducting my existing miata stock brake hardware as i increase power this winter. i am guessing there are two things i need to watch: fluid temps and rotor temps.
fluid i think i have some margin as i am running < 390* caliper temps w/o ducting.
the rotor temps i'm concerned about. it seems to me that for any given braking zone, if rotor temps go above a certain point (1400f?) you are done, you need to replace with a larger and/or more efficient rotor. is there any way of approximating this or are there too many variables?
the standby method is just to run them and see if i go through a set of rotors per day. if yes then buy bigger.
Your rotor temp will always be LOWER than your pad temp. What rotor temps are you seeing now? My caliper temps are about 250-270 deg F up front, ~220-230 deg F rear. Rotors are about 320-330 front and rear. The peak temps are likely quite a bit higher up front , since they really cool down on track, and that's after a cool down lap.
As far as heat modelling, figure 70-75% braking done up front, perfect conversion of car's kinetic energy into heat energy. Take the weight of your rotor ring, or about 70-60% of your 1 pc rotor weight as absorbing the heat. Specific heat of cast iron vs. heat input gives you temperature rise. As far as end of session temperatures - no way you're going to model that, it's way too complex as a lot of it depends on flow through the wheels and rotors(excessively complex).
Best bet is just to give it a go and see what happens. That said, Miatas are all super slow, so you'll probably be ok. :D
Matt93SE
10-24-2010, 05:29 PM
FWIW, Miatas run in GT Lite, GT3, and EP with 200+hp and stock calipers & rotors.
Stock stuff works because they're all still slow. :D
tonto
10-25-2010, 12:15 AM
u guys are mean. and correct lol i cant think of any cars on track with less hp.
ok lets me sees. figure 120 to 50 braking zone....
givens
120mph = 53.6448 m/s
50mph = 22.352 m/s
car weight 2286lb+190lb = 1123.0947 kg
1 rotor = 4650 g
c of cast iron = .46 (http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/specific-heat-metals-d_152.html)
Ej = 1/2 m v^2
(1123*53.6^2)/2
1613167.04000000000000000000
(1123*22.3^2)/2
279228.33500000000000000000
delta E = 1613167-279228 = 1333939
figure delta degree K
(1333939/1000)/(.46*(4650/1000))
623.62739597942964001870
623 *K = 661* F
take 75% front bias, divide by 2 because 2 rotors
661*.75*.5 = 247.875 * delta F
250 degree rise? sounds fine. ill get some temp paint tho :D
(did i screw up any #'s?)
Equinox
10-25-2010, 01:33 AM
Kind off off-topic but has anyone used this stuff?
http://tinyurl.com/3a8bh7y
Seems like a good price compared to the three seperate ones floating around.
tonto
10-25-2010, 11:38 AM
^^ not offtopic at all. thats exactly the stuff i was thinking about getting (for rotors and hubs). was trying to talk some other local folks into chipping in cause thats like a lifetime supply right there...
u guys are mean. and correct lol i cant think of any cars on track with less hp.
ok lets me sees. figure 120 to 50 braking zone....
givens
120mph = 53.6448 m/s
50mph = 22.352 m/s
car weight 2286lb+190lb = 1123.0947 kg
1 rotor = 4650 g
c of cast iron = .46 (http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/specific-heat-metals-d_152.html)
Ej = 1/2 m v^2
(1123*53.6^2)/2
1613167.04000000000000000000
(1123*22.3^2)/2
279228.33500000000000000000
delta E = 1613167-279228 = 1333939
figure delta degree K
(1333939/1000)/(.46*(4650/1000))
623.62739597942964001870
623 *K = 661* F
take 75% front bias, divide by 2 because 2 rotors
661*.75*.5 = 247.875 * delta F
250 degree rise? sounds fine. ill get some temp paint tho :D
(did i screw up any #'s?)
No ideas on the numbers, my brain is fried from work. But keep in mind that temp increase is on top of your existing temperature, so it's constantly a game from shedding the heat before the next corner before spiking up again.
tonto
10-25-2010, 08:43 PM
But keep in mind that temp increase is on top of your existing temperature, so it's constantly a game from shedding the heat before the next corner before spiking up again.
ya agreed. but to me, this is the "steady state" case. if i can get the cooling setup to reach this steady state, then i no longer have to worry about brakes of a certain "thermal capacity" which i see advertised.
vBulletin® v3.7.4, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.